Welcome to Wisdom & Sol! If you haven’t subscribed, join our community of 95,000 intelligent, curious folks who want to boost their emotional well-being by subscribing here. 

I’m sure you’ve been in a meeting at work or school when someone proposes an idea for a project you’re all working on together. It’s new, it's different, and it would take real effort to pull off. Before they’ve even finished explaining it, several people start chiming in with reasons it won’t work.

“I haven't heard any customers ask for this.” 

“That would introduce too much complexity.” 

“We tried something like that before, and it didn't work.” 

“People are used to the way it works now.”

These people are probably intelligent, and they might not be wrong. Still, even if all of their objections may be valid, they're incomplete. They name a problem without proposing a path through it. That's half a contribution at best. Plus, none have added a single ounce of value.

In most meetings, raising an objection feels like contributing. It sounds smart and signals experience. It makes you look like the practical adult in the room. But pointing out that something might fail isn’t the same as making it work. And if your default move is to look for the flaw before you’ve understood the upside, you’re not adding to the team—you’re slowly draining it.

There’s a fundamental asymmetry between proposing an idea and shooting it down. Proposing requires imagination, time, and a willingness to look a little foolish. Shooting it down requires one sentence and no preparation. You can be completely useless in the moment and still walk out of the meeting feeling like you “challenged the thinking.”

The person proposing might have been chewing on their idea for weeks, maybe months. They’ve stress-tested it in their head, talked to a few people, and sketched it on a napkin at lunch. They understand things about it that aren’t yet obvious. Then they get five minutes to explain it to a room of people hearing it for the first time—and those people (like the rest of us) are wired to spot threats faster than opportunities.

It’s negativity bias, loss aversion, and status quo bias all at work. Our brains overweigh what could go wrong because, historically, missing a threat was far more costly than missing an opportunity. Add a meeting culture where everyone wants to be seen as sharp, and you get a predictable result: Criticism wins because it’s cheap.

As one saying goes, fault-finding is a minimum-wage job. Anyone can do it.

The real damage isn’t that the one idea gets killed in the room. It's that there are 10 ideas that never get proposed afterward.

People learn fast. If your last three suggestions were picked apart before you finished your sentence, you’re not going to bring number four to the group. You’ll keep it in a Notes app, talk about it with one trusted coworker over coffee, or just let it die. Multiply that across a team, and you end up with a culture where only the safe, obvious, incremental ideas get aired—the ones nobody can object to because they barely move the needle.

You can usually tell when a team has gotten here. Meetings feel productive, but nothing surprising ever comes out of them. The roadmap looks like last quarter’s, with the dates updated. People with real range either go quiet or leave. And those still proposing things start hedging—pre-apologizing, softening, and asking permission to even raise the topic.

Early ideas are fragile by definition. They’re incomplete because they’re early. Judging a half-formed idea by the standard of a finished one is like pointing at a caterpillar and calling it a bad butterfly. If you can’t articulate why a smart, experienced person thought this was worth raising—if you genuinely don’t get it—that's a signal you don’t yet know enough to have an opinion. Ask another question instead.

Edward de Bono's “Six Thinking Hats” framework addressed this phenomenon decades ago. His core insight: Optimistic and critical thinking are both valuable, but they need to happen separately. Mix them, and critical thinking always wins because it’s cognitively cheaper.

You can run a version of his framework in any meeting, even an informal one.

A few habits help this stick:

The easiest move in any meeting is to point out what’s wrong with something. It costs nothing and sounds smart. The harder move—the one that strengthens over a career—is to shelter a half-formed idea long enough to see what it could become.

This doesn’t mean turning off your judgment. It means putting it in the right order. Understand first, imagine the upside, then apply scrutiny. Done that way, criticism is a tool that sharpens ideas. Done in the wrong order, it’s just a way to look thoughtful while quietly making sure nothing new ever happens.

The next time you feel the urge to say “That won’t work” before someone finishes their sentence, just pause. Ask yourself whether you actually understand what they’re proposing yet. If the answer is no, you already know what to do.

Plus, the 5-to-1 rule that keeps couples together

Thinner lashes after 50 aren’t “just aging”

It is also the way you're taking care of them...expired mascara, waterproof formulas, heated curlers, harsh preservatives, and more.

This page breaks down 6 things to stop today + what to use instead for lift without irritation. Read the lash tips.

Learn more

We love you,
Mona & The Sol TV Team ❤️

Lastly, some housekeeping…

If you can't find this newsletter, check your spam folder. If it’s there, mark it as “not spam.”